IR Paper Strength and Weakness Analysis

Paper 1:
Strengths:

1. Gives differences between different writings in the field
2. Easy to understand from an outside reader
3. Introduction of evidence it smooth

Weaknesses

1. Feels repetitive at times
2. Can be choppy sometimes
3. Added necessary language

Paper 2:

Strengths:

1. The interview felt like a real conversation
2. Lots of evidence of the different types of writing in the field used
3. Puts emphasis on the amount of writing that must be done in that specific field

Weaknesses

1. Introduction is a little confusing
2. The ethical appeal of the interviewee was not immediately clear
3. Was possibly using too many quotes from the interview

Paper 3:
Strengths:

1. Very good explanation of the fields writing types.
2. Easy to understand
3. Well structured

Weaknesses

1. Unnecessary language used
2. Too many quotes
3. Conclusion was a little abrupt

Paper 4:
Strengths:

1. Introduction of the sources
2. Spaced out quotes
3. quotes were strong

Weaknesses

1. Very long winded sentences
2. Unnecessary language
3. long winded conclusion

Paper 5:
Strengths:

1. Explains the field to the reader
2. Analysis of writing details was strong
3. Gives many pertinent examples

Weaknesses

1. Very short and choppy sentences in introduction
2. redundant at times
3. Not needed creative titles

Paper 6:
Strengths:

1. Great use of quotes
2. Explained quotes well
3. Structure of the paper is easy to understand

Weaknesses

1. lead up to the quotes
2. very general conslusion
3. sometimes is choppy